Open-source tools — Instead of doing it by hand

5 match your filters — 5 of them answered our check today.

Watching this group for 20 days · how we check

This weekno new arrivals

Narrow it down

Ortu

Live

A cross-platform clipboard manager with full history, search and secret masking for anyone who copy-pastes constantly - handy for developers managing API keys, but useful for any heavy copy-paste workflow.

No sign-upWorks offlineOpen source

What to know▼

How it works: Remembers everything you copy - text, images, files - across macOS, Windows and Linux, with full-text search, a paste stack, secret masking with encryption, and smart auto-grouping.
What's different: Runs 100% locally with no account, and is open source.
Pricing: Not stated beyond being open source.
Best for: Developers and anyone who copy-pastes constantly, including people managing API keys via clipboard.

Watched for 16 days · last checked 10d ago

Details →

TeamCopilot

Live

An open-source, self-hosted platform for shared AI workflows, like auto-drafting WhatsApp replies or pinging Slack on server errors, instead of everyone writing one-off prompts. For technical teams willing to self-host.

Open sourceSelf-hosted

What to know▼

How it works: An open-source, self-hosted platform for building reusable AI workflows with human-approval steps built in — for example, drafting a WhatsApp reply but requiring sign-off before sending, or checking server logs and pinging a teammate on Slack when an error appears.
What's different: Workflows are built once and shared across a team instead of every person creating one-off prompts, and it runs fully on your own infrastructure with any AI model.
Best for: Technical teams willing to self-host who want shared, auditable AI automations instead of ad hoc prompting.

Watched for 16 days · last checked 10d ago

Details →

PathDeck

Live

A free, open-source macOS app for editing your $PATH, aliases and environment variables through a drag-and-drop UI instead of hand-editing shell config files.

Open source

What to know▼

How it works: A macOS app with a drag-and-drop dashboard for editing your $PATH, toggling shell aliases, and managing environment variables, with sensitive keys secured behind Touch ID.
What's different: Replaces hand-editing shell config files with a visual UI, and is under 1.4MB, open source, built in SwiftUI.
Pricing: Open source.
Best for: Developers on macOS who are tired of manually editing dotfiles to manage PATH, aliases and env variables.

Watched for 17 days · last checked 8d ago

Details →

Sora UI

Live

A library of skeuomorphic React components — CD players, tactile dials, audio visualizers — you copy-paste into your own Next.js/Tailwind project and own outright. For developers.

Open source

What to know▼

How it works: A copy-paste React component library modeled after physical objects like CD players, tactile selectors and audio visualizers, built with Next.js, Tailwind CSS v4 and Framer Motion spring physics.
What's different: Skeuomorphic, physically-inspired design, and you own the code outright instead of depending on a package.
Best for: Developers who want tactile, physically-inspired UI components for a React/Next.js app.

Watched for 17 days · last checked 8d ago

Details →

Interview Rubric

Live

Generates a structured, weighted interview rubric and matching job description from a JD you paste in - built for recruiters and hiring panels, not classroom teachers.

FreeOpen source

What to know▼

How it works: Three tools in one: a Rubric Creator that turns a pasted job description into a structured, weighted interview rubric with suggested questions; a JD Generator that turns a plain-English role description into a polished job description; and an Interview Prep tool that generates likely questions per interview round.
What's different: Focuses on defining evaluation criteria upfront, rather than sourcing or scheduling, which most hiring tools focus on instead.
Pricing: Free and open source.
Best for: Recruiters and hiring panels who want interviewers aligned on what 'good' looks like before evaluating candidates.

Watched for 17 days · last checked 11d ago

Details →