Commit Intent
Pre-commit hook that writes an intent doc by mining AI chats
What this is
A pre-commit git hook that mines your AI chat transcripts to auto-write a short intent doc explaining why the code changed, staged into the same commit.
Our one-line summary — not the founder’s tagline.
- How it works
- A pre-commit git hook that matches your AI chat session transcripts to the files you've staged, then uses the Claude Code CLI to distill the reasoning behind the change into an intent document saved in docs/intents/ and staged into the same commit.
- What's different
- Captures the why behind AI-generated diffs that normally stays only in chat logs, without requiring a new platform or workflow, and never blocks a commit.
- Best for
- Developers using AI coding assistants who want the reasoning behind large AI-written diffs preserved alongside the code in git history.
What we measured
Nobody else publishes this — it comes from knocking on the door every day.
- Watched by us
- 11 days
- Last checked
- 2d ago
Where it shows up
Every group here is a page of its own — each one checked daily.
The numbersIs it still shipping, is it overpriced, where did it land — and what the price is built from.
League price & chart
No money. No seat. It goes on your record — and in 28 days reality settles it.
Calls are closed while we rebuild accounts. You can still read every one of them.
AI. Launched 11d ago on Product Hunt, picking up 6 votes. Today, the site itself changed 3d ago — evidence it's still shipping, not just announcing.
Quiet for 3 days — no penalty yet, but quiet doesn't stay free.
We check this site every day, ourselves. A founder can post “still working on it” — a claim like that doesn't price. What we price is what we can verify from the outside: evidence, not announcements. The real question isn't “will this be huge?” — it's “will they still be moving in four weeks?”
The market viewHow this launch is priced and ranked in our league — the investor side of the page.
ranked by the reality anchor, not the market price
It launched on Product Hunt with 6 votes.
No matter how much money goes in. There is no pump here — you can't make yourself right by buying more. The line only moves on things that actually happened: an award, revenue that grew, a new platform, code that shipped — or silence.
2 quiet days in between are left out — nothing happened on them. A launch that goes quiet eases down a little at a time — never a cliff you could have run from the night before.
No names, on purpose — a call is worth what it turns out to be worth, not who made it.
Daily tracking just started for this launch — the first point is on the board. A second reading lands with tomorrow's run, and the curve builds from there.
How the launch is moving on its own board, day by day — the crowd's attention.
A flat line is normal: votes stop within a day or two of launch, on every board. What's unusual — and what actually counts — is a launch that keeps pulling votes long after its day is over.
About
Git records what changed, not why. When AI writes a 300-line diff, the reasoning, constraints, and decisions stay behind in chat logs on your disk. That's the newest technical debt: lost context. At commit time, it matches session transcripts to your staged files and uses the Claude Code CLI you already have to distill the intent into docs/intents/, staged into the same commit as the code it explains. The why travels with the what. No new platform, no new workflow, no commit ever blocked.
Where it launched
1 platform| Platform | Votes | Counts toward price | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Hunt | 6 | sets the price | ↗ |
The board it did best on sets the price. Every other board only adds to it if the launch also placed high on that board too — because just showing up somewhere isn't an achievement. Listing on twelve directories is free; placing well on them isn't.
Discussion (0)
No thesis posted yet. Be the first.