RefereeAhead · Office #51,273

Where it puts itself

Rules out “Language editing”.

• Says it will not: Language editing

“A full report runs two independent review passes and merges them. On our benchmark the merge lifted major-concern recall by 8 points, from 70% to 78%, over a single pass — the step most people skip when they ask a chatbot.”

“Does it rewrite or polish my English? Response No. Language editing is a different job”

What it costs

One-time purchase. A free tier up to a usage limit. No monthly plan. 6 prices listed on its pages, from $0 to $99.

• One-time: yes
• Monthly: no
• Free plan: free up to a limit
• Price: 6 prices, from $0 to $99

“$ 0 no card needed”

“$19.80 per report”

“$23 per report”

Who it sells to

Sells to consumers. Sells into life-science.

• Sells to: consumers
• Sells into: life-science

“The questions researchers ask before trusting us with an unpublished paper.”

How it runs

A web app. Hosted in the cloud. AI is the core of the product. Built with Google Analytics.

• Kind: web
• Runs where: cloud / hosted
• AI role: core to the product
• Analytics: Google Analytics

“Upload a manuscript.”

“Sent to the model only to write your review, and deleted from our storage 30 days after the report.”

What it works with

Integrates with Crossref and Retraction Watch.

• Integrates with: Crossref · Retraction Watch

“Each reference is looked up in Crossref and Retraction Watch.”

“RefereeAhead reads your life-science manuscript the way a referee would and lists the concerns likely to come back”

What it offers as proof

Live, no waitlist. Try it without signing up.

• Instant signup: yes
• Trial asks for: nothing

“Run free scan”

“No account needed to see it.”